Software architect working in Symbian/S60 area since 2000 and still being enthusiastic about mobility. Please visit my introduction page on Forum Nokia Champions web page.
tote_b5 | 22 July, 2008 23:07
It's obvious that it's not in everybody's interest to let Nokia gain more control over Symbian - not the OS, but Foundation this time. It's a fact that Symbian was (or still is?) owned ~48% by Nokia.
As part of the announcement of making Symbian OS open-source it also
came to light that voting rights will be according to the number of
Symbian Foundation-based mobile phones shipped. And since Nokia has
shipped more than 70% of Symbian-powered devices so far, it puts them
into a more powerful position than they've been before.
As
I said it's obvious that not everybody likes it from those companies
who are on the same ship with Nokia. The surprising bit is that even
somebody at a power position at Symbian thinks this way AND make comments on this in public. John Forsyth said that he's "worried this asymmetry will mean the community doesn't grow in the appropriate way." His suggestions include "clean-room culture" and a one company-one vote system.
Naturally Nokia won't accept latter after spending lots of money on
Symbian - they made Symbian successful, they invested the most in it
and now at the turning point of Symbian's life they'd like to take the
opportunity to increase their influence on it, too.
Wonder what John thought about this when sharing his opinion in public. Perhaps we can read something about it in his blog in the future...
Tote
mobile-thoughts.blogspot.com
Software architect working in Symbian/S60 area since 2000 and still being enthusiastic about mobility. Please visit my introduction page on Forum Nokia Champions web page.