Who am I?
I've been poking my nose in mobile software development since 2000, starting on what was then the ER5 and Ericsson's R380. Since then I've been doing a bit of everything on the S60 Platform, from learning its bits and pieces to helping others find their way trough the maze.
Calendar
Recently...
- Load your application in a running emulator
- Build without an SDK, test without a device
- The ultimate* software installer debug guide
- Nokia N97 SDK v1.0 released
- Good news on the Horizon
- Qt for S60 "Tower" demo running on Nokia N97
- Qt for S60 "Tower" released
- Symbian Foundation promo videos
- Happy Birthday Symbian Signed!
- More Symbian Foundation beta invites
Categories
- ActivePerl [1]
- Browsing [0]
- Business Opportunities/Services [0]
- Carbide.c++ [7]
- Carbide.ui [1]
- CDMA [0]
- Connectivity [0]
- Emulator [1]
- Enterprise [0]
- Entertainment [0]
- Event [2]
- Flash [0]
- Fun [1]
- Games [0]
- GCCE [2]
- General [9]
- Hack [4]
- Installer [1]
- Java [1]
- Location Based Services [0]
- Maemo [1]
- Messaging [0]
- Mobile [1]
- Mobile [1]
- N96 [1]
- Open C [1]
- Ovi [1]
- Perl [1]
- Python [0]
- Qt for S60 [3]
- Qt for Symbian [2]
- S60 [23]
- SDK [6]
- Series 40 [1]
- Series 80 [1]
- Symbian [9]
- Symbian C++ [16]
- Testing [1]
- UI [1]
- Vista [1]
- Web Run-Time (WRT) [2]
- Widget [0]
- Windows [1]
- Windows 7 [1]
- Windows Vista [0]
Lucian Tomuta's Forum Nokia Blog
Undocumented Symbian OS and S60 panics
ltomuta | 05 March, 2008 17:02
You know it and I know it, the SDK documentation can be better. In many ways. But maybe the most critical issue is the way the returned errors, leave codes and panics are "documented" is really mind-bugling. One frequent statement is something like "If something goes wrong the method will leave with a system wide error code". Great, like I could not say that by just seeing the nice method name. (More)
S60, Symbian C++ |
Permalink |
Comments (4) |
Trackbacks (0)
