You Are Here:

Community: Blogs

Who am I?

Rippe

Works for Forum Nokia where his task is to represent Nokia in Symbian Signed and Java Verified.

 

Calendar

« October 2007 »
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
 

Risto Helin's Forum Nokia Blog

RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

Rippe | 09 October, 2007 08:50

Hello,

We are internally wondering the importance of adding Series 40 devices to RDA (you know, the service which allows you to access devices over the Internet, www.forum.nokia.com/rda). What do you think? Should we also support Series 40 or just stick with S60 support?

Please note that we did add few SIMs there as well, so in case you have not tried them out yet...

Testing | Next | Previous | Comments (12) | Trackbacks (1)

RSSComments

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

chrisp97 | 09/10/2007, 09:06

Yes please! Series 40 devices on RDA would be fantastic.

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

slimpixi | 09/10/2007, 09:34

slimpixi what i wish more than anything is that you would develop a screen shot tool for the s 40 platform...

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

slimpixi | 09/10/2007, 09:35

slimpixi yes! you should put all platforms there!

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

biskero | 09/10/2007, 14:59

biskero Ciao Risto,

I think it would be a great addition.
Alessandro

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

tote_b5 | 10/10/2007, 00:08

tote_b5 Yeah, why not? Besides it also annoys me that there's only a few (one?) S60 2nd device in the portfolio (I mean in RDA's). It's as if you had forgotten about the fact that there're still lots of older models out there.

Cheers,

Tote

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

Rippe | 10/10/2007, 11:44

Rippe Tote,

Which devices would you like to see in RDA?

Risto

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

tote_b5 | 11/10/2007, 14:08

tote_b5 Risto,

Well it happened to me a few weeks ago that I needed to test a feature on a 2.0, 2.1 and 2.6 based phones. None of them are available in RDA. You know, it's still vital for a lot of developers to develop sw to such "old" phones, so why not add them to RDA? I'm not saying that you should add more than one in each category, just add one per platform version. Then you make some usage statistics (I'm sure you do:) to see the demand for these phones.

Anyway, I think it's a brilliant service both in terms of the idea and how it has been implemented, I'm just missing some other phones from the (S60) portfolio. But I also understand that this service, as with everything, just needs some time to further improve.

Keep up the good work,

Tote

Ps.: I'm looking fw to your presentation in London. :)

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

bloodredsky | 12/10/2007, 18:29

N70 was already there (S60 2nd ed. FP3) and I just added 6680 (S60 2nd ed. FP2). As for even older devices we will have to do some compability testing first, but taken into consideration.

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

mobileradicals | 09/10/2007, 16:56

Yes please - I think S40 support would be very useful (speaking as someone who predominantly develops in J2ME). Essentially, the S60 devices behave in a very similar manner to each other (3rd ed. anyway) compared to Series 40.

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

matrix241 | 09/10/2007, 20:27

yes! It would be great. Please could you add always the last models?

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

firt | 11/10/2007, 01:03

firt Yes! It could be a great feature! In many countries, as latin american ones, Series 40 is still the main platform of many mobile software. Java and Flash Lite are still the best platforms to develop in Series 40. So, one vote for yes ;-)

Regards,

Re: RDA: S60 vs. Series 40

bandler | 26/10/2007, 09:11

Yes! Support for S40 would be great.
You must login to post comments. Login
 

Rate This

 
 
Bookmark this page: DeliciousDiggFacebookGoogleYahooStumbleUponRedditDiigoTechnocratiTwitter  Share this page Share this page Print this Page Print this page Invite a friend Invite a friend
京ICP备05048969号    Email Newsletters Press Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Sitemap Contact Us © 2009 Nokia 
RDF Facets: qdcZdescriptionQSxWorksE20forE20ForumE20NokiaE20whereE20hisE20taskE20isE20toE20representE20NokiaE20inE20SymbianE20SignedE20andE20JavaE20VerifiedE2eE20E52ippeE20E7cE2009E20OctoberE2cE202007E2008E3a50E20HelloE2cE20WeE20areE20internallyE20wonderingE20theE20importanceE20ofE20addingE20SeriesE2040E20devicesE20toE20E52E44AE20E28youE20knowE2cE20theE20serviceE20whichE20allowsE20youE20toE20accessE20devicesE20overE20theE20InternetE2cE20wwwE2eforumE2enokiaE2ecomE2frdaE29E2eE20WhatE20doE20youE20thinkE3fE20ShouldE20weE20alsoE20supportE20SeriesE2040E20orE20justE20stickE20withE20S60E20supportE3fE20PleaseE20noteE20thatE20weE20didE20addE20fewE20SIMsE20thereE20asE20wellE2cE20soE20inE20caseE20youE20haveE20notE20triedE20themE20outE20yetE2eE2eE2eE20TesE2eE2eE2eX qdcZidentifierQSxhttpE3aE2fE2fblogsE2eforumE2enokiaE2ecomE2fblogE2fristoE2dhelinsE2dforumE2dnokiaE2dblogE2f2007E2f10E2f09E2frdaE2ds60E2dvsE2eE2dseriesE2d40X qdcZpublisherQUxhttpE3aE2fE2fswE2enokiaE2ecomE2fidE2fc764fd1cE2d8b06E2d499aE2d9a6aE2d17c3903d5a65E2fforumE5fnokiaE5fcrawlerE5fagentX qdcZtitleQSxE52istoE20HelinE27sE20ForumE20NokiaE20BlogE20E7cE20E52E44AE3aE20S60E20vsE2eE20SeriesE2040X qdcZtypeQUqfnZE45E78cludedFromGeneralE4cistingsQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogContentQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogE45ntryQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZCommunityContentQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZWebpageQ qdcZtypeQUqmarsZManagedE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqwebZInformationE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqwebZPageQ qdcZtypeQUqwebZE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqrdfsZE52esourceQ qrssZdescriptionQSxWorksE20forE20ForumE20NokiaE20whereE20hisE20taskE20isE20toE20representE20NokiaE20inE20SymbianE20SignedE20andE20JavaE20VerifiedE2eE20E52ippeE20E7cE2009E20OctoberE2cE202007E2008E3a50E20HelloE2cE20WeE20areE20internallyE20wonderingE20theE20importanceE20ofE20addingE20SeriesE2040E20devicesE20toE20E52E44AE20E28youE20knowE2cE20theE20serviceE20whichE20allowsE20youE20toE20accessE20devicesE20overE20theE20InternetE2cE20wwwE2eforumE2enokiaE2ecomE2frdaE29E2eE20WhatE20doE20youE20thinkE3fE20ShouldE20weE20alsoE20supportE20SeriesE2040E20orE20justE20stickE20withE20S60E20supportE3fE20PleaseE20noteE20thatE20weE20didE20addE20fewE20SIMsE20thereE20asE20wellE2cE20soE20inE20caseE20youE20haveE20notE20triedE20themE20outE20yetE2eE2eE2eE20TesE2eE2eE2eX qfnZdistributionQUxhttpE3aE2fE2fblogsE2eforumE2enokiaE2ecomE2fX qfnZtopicQUqfnTopicZtestingQRqdcZtypeQUqrdfsZE52esourceQRqmarsZrelevanceQNx100X qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogContentQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogE45ntryQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZCommunityContentQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZE52esourceQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZWebpageQ qfnZupdatedQDx2007E2d10E2d26X qfnZuserE5ftagQSxtestingX qmarsZdescriptionQSxWorksE20forE20ForumE20NokiaE20whereE20hisE20taskE20isE20toE20representE20NokiaE20inE20SymbianE20SignedE20andE20JavaE20VerifiedE2eE20E52ippeE20E7cE2009E20OctoberE2cE202007E2008E3a50E20HelloE2cE20WeE20areE20internallyE20wonderingE20theE20importanceE20ofE20addingE20SeriesE2040E20devicesE20toE20E52E44AE20E28youE20knowE2cE20theE20serviceE20whichE20allowsE20youE20toE20accessE20devicesE20overE20theE20InternetE2cE20wwwE2eforumE2enokiaE2ecomE2frdaE29E2eE20WhatE20doE20youE20thinkE3fE20ShouldE20weE20alsoE20supportE20SeriesE2040E20orE20justE20stickE20withE20S60E20supportE3fE20PleaseE20noteE20thatE20weE20didE20addE20fewE20SIMsE20thereE20asE20wellE2cE20soE20inE20caseE20youE20haveE20notE20triedE20themE20outE20yetE2eE2eE2eE20TesE2eE2eE2eX qmarsZlanguageQUxhttpE3aE2fE2fswE2enokiaE2ecomE2flanguageE2d1E2fenX qrdfZtypeQUqfnZE45E78cludedFromGeneralE4cistingsQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogContentQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogE45ntryQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZCommunityContentQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZWebpageQ qrdfZtypeQUqmarsZManagedE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqwebZInformationE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqwebZPageQ qrdfZtypeQUqwebZE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqrdfsZE52esourceQ