You Are Here:

Community: Blogs

Risto Helin's Forum Nokia Blog

UE?

Rippe | 02 January, 2009 15:05

I was told that it is fashionable to use the abbreviation UX in stead of UE. Fashionable or not, I'm now referring to User Experience and using the abbreviation UE. 

What does that mean to you?

For me personally, as an end user, it means that I do not need to read a manual or help to use an application on my mobile. So "intuitive to use" comes to mind. Also "for my device" is an other phrase to use. It might be interesting to use an application intended for a touch screen device on a device without a touch screen. Or vice versa.

I've herd the term WOW also related to user experience. "WOW this looks cool!" I seldom get that. Maybe its my basic engineering character to get more exited on features than the looks. Well, the Nokia E71 did get me all exited and provided me with a WOW to the power of 10...

User Experience for me is also "working as expected". I don't want the application or my device (the E71) to crash or freeze. I want to use the features which the application is supposed to have, no more no less.

The last thing is naturally the usage security. No malicious features, my data is safe. That is partially related to the number of features.

Are you with me? Do you as application developers see something differently?

RSSComments

Re: UE?

ptrmn | 03/01/2009, 14:34

Besides obvious hygiene aspects, like programs working as advertised and being stable, to me the most important aspect of user experience is that the UI doesn't get in the way when I'm trying to do things. Too many button presses, too many sub menus, too much of what you might consider as ease of use if you follow the Microsoft school, it just ruins the user experience for me.

As for the WOW, to achieve that you have to take a step beyond regular UI toolkits and do something different. I still find myself longing back to the 80's, when an app could have its complete own look. One of my favorites is X-Copy: http://www.vht-dk.dk/vhtdk/amiga/desc/gif/xcopy65.gif

Re: UE?

coultonp | 05/01/2009, 15:50

coultonp

For good user experience the application should become invisible and the user merely performs the task. Personally I feel mobile is only justwaking up to these ideas. I recommend people read Don Normans "Design of Future Things" and "Design of Everday Things" which arent specifically about mobile but are allabout designing for the user

Re: ptrmn

mobiel internet | 05/01/2009, 16:50

X-Copy looks a bit.... cluttered.

You must login to post comments. Login
 

Rate This

 
 
Bookmark this page: DeliciousDiggFacebookGoogleYahooStumbleUponRedditDiigoTechnocratiTwitter  Share this page Share this page Print this Page Print this page Invite a friend Invite a friend
京ICP备05048969号    Email Newsletters Press Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Sitemap Contact Us © 2009 Nokia 
RDF Facets: qdcZidentifierQSxhttpE3aE2fE2fblogsE2eforumE2enokiaE2ecomE2fblogE2fristoE2dhelinsE2dforumE2dnokiaE2dblogE2f2009E2f01E2f02E2fueX qdcZtypeQUqfnZE45E78cludedFromGeneralE4cistingsQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogContentQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogE45ntryQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZCommunityContentQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqfntypeZWebpageQ qdcZtypeQUqmarsZManagedE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqwebZInformationE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqwebZPageQ qdcZtypeQUqwebZE52esourceQ qdcZtypeQUqrdfsZE52esourceQ qfnZtopicQUxhttpE3aE2fE2fswE2enokiaE2ecomE2fFNE2d1E2fBlogTopicE2fgeneralX qfnZtopicQUqfnTopicZtestingQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogContentQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogE45ntryQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZCommunityContentQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZE52esourceQ qfnZtypeQUqfntypeZWebpageQ qfnZuserE5ftagQSxtestingX qmarsZlanguageQUxhttpE3aE2fE2fswE2enokiaE2ecomE2flanguageE2d1E2fenX qrdfZtypeQUqfnZE45E78cludedFromGeneralE4cistingsQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogContentQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZBlogE45ntryQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZCommunityContentQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqfntypeZWebpageQ qrdfZtypeQUqmarsZManagedE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqwebZInformationE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqwebZPageQ qrdfZtypeQUqwebZE52esourceQ qrdfZtypeQUqrdfsZE52esourceQ
User Rating: qfnZuserE5FratingQNx4E2E0000X