<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>Harri Salminen&#039;s Forum Nokia Blog</title> 
<subtitle type="html">&lt;p&gt;Random thoughts about mobile (enterprise) application development.&lt;/p&gt;
</subtitle>
 
<updated>2006-12-05T08:11:57+02:00</updated> 
<id>http://www.lifetype.net,1.2/</id>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html"  hreflang="en" href="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/harri-salminens-forum-nokia-blog" />
 
<rights>Copyright (c) widianuser</rights>
<generator uri="http://www.lifetype.net/" version="1.2">LifeType at Forum Nokia</generator> 
 
<entry> 
<title>Updated terminal performance results</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/harri-salminens-forum-nokia-blog/2006/12/05/updated-terminal-performance-results" /> 
<id>tag:blogs.forum.nokia.com,2006-12-05:322</id>
 
<updated>2006-12-05T08:11:57+02:00</updated> 
<published>2006-12-05T08:11:57+02:00</published> 
<summary type="html">Some new performance benchmark data about current mobile phones was yesterday published  here  (previous test is  here ), showing significant differences in graphics performance between the ...</summary> 
<author> 
 
<name>widianuser</name> 
<uri>http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/harri-salminens-forum-nokia-blog</uri> 
</author> 
<dc:subject>
General 
Java 
</dc:subject> 
<content type="text/html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/harri-salminens-forum-nokia-blog"> 
Some new performance benchmark data about current mobile phones was yesterday published &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mobilemonday.net/mm/story.php?story_id=5104&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (previous test is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mobilemonday.net/mm/story.php?story_id=5052&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;), showing significant differences in graphics performance between the terminal platforms. The benchmark tests 2D and 3D graphics performance on Java platform, so the result mostly tells about the quality of JVM implementation and terminal&#039;s screen drawing capabilities. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the test doesn&#039;t tell much about the performance of native applications on Symbian platform. It would be interesting to see the results of the same test when running a native instead of Java application &amp;#8211; how much is the overhead of JVM? What I also would like to benchmark is the disk I/O performance of a Symbian terminal, for both internal and removable media.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do you know some other publicly available benchmark data or tests for smartphone performance? 
</content> 
</entry> 
 
</feed>