<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/styles/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
>
 <channel rdf:about="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/rss.php?blogId=43602&amp;profile=rss10">
  <title>Gabor Torok&#039;s Forum Nokia Blog</title>
  <link>http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog</link>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Software architect working in Symbian/S60 area since 2000 and still being enthusiastic about mobility. Please visit my introduction page on Forum Nokia Champions web page.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    <dc:creator>tote_b5</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2009-11-23T23:10:36Z</dc:date>
  <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.lifetype.net" />
  <items>
   <rdf:Seq>
       <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2008/04/10/apple-as-an-mvno" />
       <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2006/10/03/new-communications-protocol-from-nrc" />
      </rdf:Seq>
  </items> 
 </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2008/04/10/apple-as-an-mvno">
  <title>Apple as an MVNO</title>
  <link>http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2008/04/10/apple-as-an-mvno</link>
  <dc:description>Very interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/04/10/apple-is-thinking-about-its-own-iphone-mvno-new-patent-says-yes/&quot;&gt;patent&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold&quot;&gt;Apple &lt;/span&gt;(thanks to &lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold&quot;&gt;Unwired View&lt;/span&gt;), I wonder how it would work in practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally
I can see it&#039;s a viable idea, however, also wondering how roaming
charges can compete with any networks&#039; own tariff. I understand that
there would be a competition between available network operators,
however, roaming charges still remain roaming charges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tote</dc:description>
      
    <dc:subject>Business Opportunities/Services</dc:subject>
      
    <dc:subject>Connectivity</dc:subject>
      
    <dc:subject>iPhone</dc:subject>
     
    
  <dc:date>2008-04-10T16:13:42Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>tote_b5</dc:creator>
 </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2006/10/03/new-communications-protocol-from-nrc">
  <title>New communications protocol from NRC</title>
  <link>http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2006/10/03/new-communications-protocol-from-nrc</link>
  <dc:description>Nokia Research Center has just published a new communications protocol for &amp;quot;battery-seriously-constrained&amp;quot; devices, like watches, wireless sensors, etc. According to their research, Bluetooth requires way too much power that it hasn&#039;t been worth integrating it into these devices. Now I really wonder how this newborn will co-exist with already accepted &amp;amp; widely used standards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newlc.com/Wibree-a-new-short-range.html&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;, where I found this info.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tote</dc:description>
      
    <dc:subject>Connectivity</dc:subject>
     
    
  <dc:date>2006-10-03T14:00:03Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>tote_b5</dc:creator>
 </item>
 </rdf:RDF>