<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/styles/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
 <channel rdf:about="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/rss.php?profile=rss10&amp;op=ArticleComments&amp;postId=">
  <title>Gabor Torok's Forum Nokia Blog - The $1 business model</title>
  <description>Forum Nokia Blogs</description>
  <link>http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/summary.php</link>
  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
                          
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2009/03/23/the-1-business-model#comment25000" />
                          
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2009/03/23/the-1-business-model#comment24999" />
                          
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2009/03/23/the-1-business-model#comment24998" />
        </rdf:Seq>
  </items> 
 </channel>
                
  <item rdf:about="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2009/03/23/the-1-business-model#comment25000">
   <title>Re:The &#039;Lite and Pro&#039; model is still valid</title>
   <dc:title>Re:The &#039;Lite and Pro&#039; model is still valid</dc:title>
   <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the reply sir.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I now see the point but separation should neatly be done, indeed. How many would buy LCG&#039;s Xplore version? (if it is available)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My company has a product - call recorder - the lighter version with beep - full version without beep - Guess how many operators bought it? Oh yes and the trial full version for 7 days - actually the trial worked more successfully in our case :P&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
   <link>http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2009/03/23/the-1-business-model#comment25000</link>
      <dc:date>2009-03-23T11:22:56Z</dc:date>
   <dc:creator>wizard.hac</dc:creator>
  </item>
                
  <item rdf:about="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2009/03/23/the-1-business-model#comment24999">
   <title>The &#039;Lite and Pro&#039; model is still valid</title>
   <dc:title>The &#039;Lite and Pro&#039; model is still valid</dc:title>
   <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me disagree with your statement that no-one would buy the Pro version. As I wrote, separation must be well thought-out: if you can&#039;t do it in a clever way, then obviously this model is not for you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But let me give you a good example: I was involved in the development of a communications software, which enabled users to talk to each other in a secure way (even operators couldn&#039;t listen to what parties were talking about). The solution worked only between two client applications. The Lite version allowed the user to accept incoming calls, whereas you could give a call only with the Pro version. I think it&#039;s a great example of good separation of free and paid features.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
   <link>http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2009/03/23/the-1-business-model#comment24999</link>
      <dc:date>2009-03-23T10:19:51Z</dc:date>
   <dc:creator>tote_b5</dc:creator>
  </item>
                
  <item rdf:about="http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2009/03/23/the-1-business-model#comment24998">
   <title>Some Comments..</title>
   <dc:title>Some Comments..</dc:title>
   <description>&lt;p&gt;Sir, I have discussed few points,&lt;br /&gt;
http://hacwiz.blogspot.com/2009/03/discussing-1-business-model.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
   <link>http://blogs.forum.nokia.com/blog/gabor-toroks-forum-nokia-blog/2009/03/23/the-1-business-model#comment24998</link>
      <dc:date>2009-03-23T06:22:26Z</dc:date>
   <dc:creator>wizard.hac</dc:creator>
  </item>
  </rdf:RDF>